1955 Austin-Healey Tickford vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (198 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 263 kg more than 2010 Honda Civic.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Civic (193 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford. (184 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Austin-Healey Tickford | 2010 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Honda |
| Model | Tickford | Civic |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 198 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 193 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1267 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4276 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1785 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1445 mm |
