1955 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 1966 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1966 Ford GT 40 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,887 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Bentley R Type Continental weights approximately 674 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Bentley R Type Continental | 1966 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Bentley | Ford |
Model | R Type Continental | GT 40 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4887 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 125 L |