1955 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 1990 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,887 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Bentley R Type Continental weights approximately 360 kg more than 1990 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1955 Bentley R Type Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Bentley R Type Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Bentley R Type Continental | 1990 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Bentley | Chrysler |
Model | R Type Continental | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1955 | 1990 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4887 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 139 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 100 L |