1955 Bentley R Type Continental vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Bentley R Type Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Bentley R Type Continental would be higher. At 4,887 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Bentley R Type Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Bentley R Type Continental weights approximately 62 kg more than 2012 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Bentley R Type Continental | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Bentley | Cadillac |
Model | R Type Continental | CTS |
Year Released | 1955 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4887 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 68 L |