1955 Bentley S1 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Bentley S1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Bentley S1 would be higher. At 4,886 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Bentley S1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Bentley S1 weights approximately 494 kg more than 1998 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1955 Bentley S1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Bentley S1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Bentley S1 | 1998 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Bentley | Chevrolet |
Model | S1 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4886 cc | 2392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 149 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 114.3 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 76 L |