1955 BMW 501 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1958 Cadillac 62 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 BMW 501 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1955 BMW 501. (110 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1955 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1955 BMW 501. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 BMW 501 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 501 | 62 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3300 mm |