1955 BMW 501 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1964 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 BMW 501 would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1955 BMW 501. (110 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1955 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 775 kg more than 1955 BMW 501. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 BMW 501 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 501 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3300 mm |
