1955 BMW 502 vs. 1998 Chrysler Chronos
To start off, 1998 Chrysler Chronos is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 BMW 502 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (10 cylinders), 1998 Chrysler Chronos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chrysler Chronos (350 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1955 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chrysler Chronos should accelerate faster than 1955 BMW 502.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Chrysler Chronos has automatic transmission and 1955 BMW 502 has manual transmission. 1955 BMW 502 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Chrysler Chronos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 BMW 502 | 1998 Chrysler Chronos | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | 502 | Chronos |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3330 mm |