1955 BMW 502 vs. 2003 Honda Stream
To start off, 2003 Honda Stream is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda Stream (127 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1955 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda Stream should accelerate faster than 1955 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 BMW 502 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2003 Honda Stream.
Because 1955 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Stream, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 BMW 502 | 2003 Honda Stream | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 502 | Stream |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1672 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |