1955 BMW 502 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1955 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1955 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 255 kg more than 1955 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 BMW 502 | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 502 | Orlando |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4652 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1633 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2760 mm |
