1955 Bristol 403 vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1967 Ford Fairlane is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Bristol 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Bristol 403 would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1955 Bristol 403. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1955 Bristol 403. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 85 kg more than 1955 Bristol 403. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Bristol 403 | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 403 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1955 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2960 mm |