1955 Bristol 403 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1976 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Bristol 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Bristol 403 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1955 Bristol 403 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1955 Bristol 403. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1955 Bristol 403. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Bristol 403 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Bristol 403 (146 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1955 Bristol 403 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Bristol 403 | 1976 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Bristol | Mazda |
| Model | 403 | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2320 mm |
