1955 Bristol 403 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Bristol 403. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Bristol 403 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1955 Bristol 403. (87 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1955 Bristol 403.
Because 1955 Bristol 403 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Bristol 403. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Bristol 403 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 403 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1955 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |