1955 Bristol 405 vs. 2000 Ford TS-50

To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Bristol 405. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Bristol 405 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1955 Bristol 405. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1955 Bristol 405. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Bristol 405 weights approximately 32 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Bristol 405. (152 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Bristol 405. 2000 Ford TS-50 has automatic transmission and 1955 Bristol 405 has manual transmission. 1955 Bristol 405 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford TS-50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: