1955 Bristol 405 vs. 2004 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2004 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Bristol 405. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Bristol 405 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (844 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 744 more horse power than 1955 Bristol 405. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1955 Bristol 405. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Bristol 405 weights approximately 160 kg more than 2004 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 838 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Bristol 405. (152 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2004 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Bristol 405.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Bristol 405 | 2004 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Bristol | Lotec |
Model | 405 | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 844 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 152 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1150 mm |