1955 Buick 40 vs. 1952 Morris Minor
To start off, 1955 Buick 40 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Morris Minor would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1952 Morris Minor. (27 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1952 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 951 kg more than 1952 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Morris Minor. (53 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 1952 Morris Minor | |
Make | Buick | Morris |
Model | 40 | Minor |
Year Released | 1955 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 803 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 53 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 774 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2190 mm |