1955 Buick 40 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (545 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Buick 40. (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Buick | Dodge |
Model | 40 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1955 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 7206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 545 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1600 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2800 mm |