1955 Buick 40 vs. 1971 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1971 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1971 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 765 kg more than 1971 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Mazda RX-2. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Buick 40 | 1971 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | 40 | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5277 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 234 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 960 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2480 mm |
