1955 Buick 40 vs. 1988 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1988 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1988 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1955 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Buick 40 | 1988 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Buick | Chrysler |
| Model | 40 | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5277 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 234 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1200 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2560 mm |
