1955 Buick 40 vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Because 1955 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Buick | Acura |
Model | 40 | TL |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2840 mm |