1955 Buick 40 vs. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (225 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 77 kg more than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (407 Nm). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Buick | Jeep |
Model | 40 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1955 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 407 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1648 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2700 mm |