1955 Buick 40 vs. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 44 kg more than 1955 Buick 40.
Because 1955 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora. (353 Nm). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Buick | Oldsmobile |
Model | 40 | Aurora |
Year Released | 1955 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1769 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2900 mm |