1955 Buick 40 vs. 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM
To start off, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM (664 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 430 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM (773 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Buick 40. (447 Nm). This means 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 1998 Mercedes-Benz CLK LM | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 40 | CLK LM |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 664 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 773 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1410 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2600 mm |