1955 Buick 40 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (302 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 690 kg more than 1955 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (569 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Buick 40. (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1955 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 6801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 2415 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3510 mm |