1955 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2002 Acura CL.
Because 1955 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura CL. (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura CL.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2002 Acura CL | |
Make | Buick | Acura |
Model | 40 | CL |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1580 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2580 mm |