1955 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Citroen C8
To start off, 2002 Citroen C8 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C8. (201 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Citroen C8 weights approximately 112 kg more than 1955 Buick 40.
Because 1955 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C8, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C8. (285 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C8.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2002 Citroen C8 | |
Make | Buick | Citroen |
Model | 40 | C8 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1837 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2830 mm |