1955 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Honda That
To start off, 2002 Honda That is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2002 Honda That. (67 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Honda That. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 885 kg more than 2002 Honda That. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Honda That is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda That will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda That. (151 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda That.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2002 Honda That | |
Make | Buick | Honda |
Model | 40 | That |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 151 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2410 mm |