1955 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Lada 2123
To start off, 2002 Lada 2123 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2002 Lada 2123. (76 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 2123. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2002 Lada 2123. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Lada 2123. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Lada 2123.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2002 Lada 2123 | |
Make | Buick | Lada |
Model | 40 | 2123 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 1688 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1325 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2460 mm |