1955 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz S (493 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 259 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz S weights approximately 410 kg more than 1955 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz S (801 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Buick 40. (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2002 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 40 | S |
Year Released | 1955 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 5513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 493 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 801 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 2135 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2720 mm |