1955 Buick 40 vs. 2003 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2003 GMC Sierra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 GMC Sierra (275 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 GMC Sierra weights approximately 220 kg more than 1955 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 GMC Sierra. (386 Nm). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2003 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Buick | GMC |
Model | 40 | Sierra |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 4816 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 386 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1945 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 3380 mm |