1955 Buick 40 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 289 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (221 Nm). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | 6 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 221 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1436 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2680 mm |