1955 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 427 kg more than 2005 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Buick 40 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | 40 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5277 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 234 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1298 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2620 mm |
