1955 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 14 kg more than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Lincoln LS. (388 Nm). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Lincoln LS.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Buick | Lincoln |
Model | 40 | LS |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 3932 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 388 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1711 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2910 mm |