1955 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis (239 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 132 kg more than 1955 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis. (389 Nm). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Buick | Mercury |
Model | 40 | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 1955 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 239 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 389 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1857 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2920 mm |