1955 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Buick 40. (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 40 | CK |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2440 mm |