1955 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 273 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Buick 40. (447 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 40 | CLS |
Year Released | 1955 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 507 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 630 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |