1955 Buick 40 vs. 2008 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac STS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac STS (321 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac STS weights approximately 87 kg more than 1955 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Cadillac STS. (427 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2008 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | STS |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1812 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2960 mm |