1955 Buick 40 vs. 2008 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2008 Nissan 350Z is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan 350Z (306 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 473 kg more than 2008 Nissan 350Z.
Because 1955 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan 350Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan 350Z. (363 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan 350Z.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2008 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Buick | Nissan |
Model | 40 | 350Z |
Year Released | 1955 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 363 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1252 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2660 mm |