1955 Buick 40 vs. 2010 BMW M5
To start off, 2010 BMW M5 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW M5 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW M5 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1955 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW M5 (519 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Buick 40. (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 BMW M5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Buick 40 | 2010 BMW M5 | |
Make | Buick | BMW |
Model | 40 | M5 |
Year Released | 1955 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5277 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 234 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7750 RPM |
Torque | 447 Nm | 519 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1725 kg | 1820 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2888 mm |