1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1972 Triumph 2000 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 755 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | 62 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1955 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2700 mm |