1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 1974 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1974 Holden Belmont is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1974 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1974 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1974 Holden Belmont. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 1974 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | 62 | Belmont |
Year Released | 1955 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 2834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2830 mm |