1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 1978 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1978 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1978 Ford Mustang. (138 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1978 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 710 kg more than 1978 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Cadillac 62 | 1978 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1955 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 4941 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2560 mm |
