1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 1983 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Brougham.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 1983 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | 62 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1955 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3090 mm |