1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 1998 Acura CL is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1998 Acura CL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1998 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1998 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 1998 Acura CL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | 62 | CL |
Year Released | 1955 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2715 mm |