1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 1999 Mazda AZ
To start off, 1999 Mazda AZ is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1955 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 1999 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 1999 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1955 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 1999 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | AZ |
Year Released | 1955 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2370 mm |