1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Ford Think Neighbor
To start off, 2001 Ford Think Neighbor is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2001 Ford Think Neighbor. (130 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Think Neighbor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 720 kg more than 2001 Ford Think Neighbor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Ford Think Neighbor | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Think Neighbor |
Year Released | 1955 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 2670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1170 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2870 mm |