1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Pontiac Montana
To start off, 2001 Pontiac Montana is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2001 Pontiac Montana. (148 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2001 Pontiac Montana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 653 kg more than 2001 Pontiac Montana. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Pontiac Montana, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Pontiac Montana | |
Make | Cadillac | Pontiac |
Model | 62 | Montana |
Year Released | 1955 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1347 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2850 mm |