1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2003 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1955 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1955 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 678 kg more than 1955 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1955 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | 62 | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5424 cc | 5967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 340 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 2678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 3310 mm |
