1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Honda Fit

To start off, 2003 Honda Fit is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2003 Honda Fit. (82 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 940 kg more than 2003 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1955 Cadillac 62 2003 Honda Fit
Make Cadillac Honda
Model 62 Fit
Year Released 1955 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5424 cc 1335 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 267 HP 82 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 2000 kg 1060 kg
Vehicle Length 5510 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 2050 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 3290 mm 2460 mm