1955 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Jeep Liberty
To start off, 2003 Jeep Liberty is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Liberty. (210 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Liberty.
Because 2003 Jeep Liberty is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1955 Cadillac 62 has automatic transmission and 2003 Jeep Liberty has manual transmission. 2003 Jeep Liberty will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1955 Cadillac 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1955 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Jeep Liberty | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | Liberty |
Year Released | 1955 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5424 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5510 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2050 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3290 mm | 2660 mm |